What's really interesting is that the Sean Opry video that wants to be a Weber video is really bad, which in contrast shows how it's not so easy to do what Bruce does. The comparison makes me appreciate brucie's efforts more! Poor Bruce...
Andrew: I really think the given time frame, which is maybe 2 minutes really communicate what NEEDS to be communicated and hence makes for a better video. the sean o'pry one is rather more generous, time wise resulting in feeling of bloatedness - too little to say stretched over too long a piece. if u look at the bw making of, you'll notice a lot of scenes have been excised... no doubt to turn up in some future rambling movie which will bore us to tears. poor brucie indeed.
cutie sean really is gay as a 3-dollar bill isn't he? even his mini-yorkie has a drag name: lily la boo...:)
ReplyDeletesee here:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KHovu5aV1UQ
Anon: I don't know much about Sean O really...
ReplyDeleteif you had to choose one of them...? I think you know which one would be my choice...!
ReplyDeleteAndrew: Andres of course! I would too... ha but what do you think of the Bruce video? I guess tolerably good given the time frame?
ReplyDeleteWhat's really interesting is that the Sean Opry video that wants to be a Weber video is really bad, which in contrast shows how it's not so easy to do what Bruce does. The comparison makes me appreciate brucie's efforts more! Poor Bruce...
ReplyDeleteAndrew: I really think the given time frame, which is maybe 2 minutes really communicate what NEEDS to be communicated and hence makes for a better video. the sean o'pry one is rather more generous, time wise resulting in feeling of bloatedness - too little to say stretched over too long a piece.
ReplyDeleteif u look at the bw making of, you'll notice a lot of scenes have been excised... no doubt to turn up in some future rambling movie which will bore us to tears. poor brucie indeed.