Dear Beauty and Dear Uncle CF: I don't think it has anything to do with being old - featuring a boy this young, and in this context just doesn't feel right, even if the contents hardly deliver the promise. The pictures inside are pretty tame to the point of being banal, but the promise itself is offensive.
Dear Liberal Anon: Hmmm i guess for me the fuss is less about the age thing so much as the fact that he may not have known when he went for the sitting that it was going to be soft porn? He probably went thinking it's a fashion shoot. as i've said before, the images are actually banal beyond anything. And, yes, lets hope he is at least 18, though he doesn't seem that old.
Oh dear. I must be really old becos I really disagree with this.
ReplyDeleteOld Fogey Corner: I second that, Ms Beauty.
ReplyDeleteDear Beauty and Dear Uncle CF: I don't think it has anything to do with being old - featuring a boy this young, and in this context just doesn't feel right, even if the contents hardly deliver the promise. The pictures inside are pretty tame to the point of being banal, but the promise itself is offensive.
ReplyDeletehow old is this twink? as long as he's at least 18, i don't see what's the fuss
ReplyDeleteabout.
Dear Liberal Anon: Hmmm i guess for me the fuss is less about the age thing so much as the fact that he may not have known when he went for the sitting that it was going to be soft porn? He probably went thinking it's a fashion shoot.
ReplyDeleteas i've said before, the images are actually banal beyond anything. And, yes, lets hope he is at least 18, though he doesn't seem that old.